Thursday, December 30, 2021

Yet Another Slow Moving Trainwreck: U18 Girls Worlds Cancelled

 Well, the U18 Girls World Championship was cancelled for the second year in a row. Several other tourneys were cancelled too, though none other at the top level of IIHF competition. At least at first. Covid eventually  took down the U20 Men's World Juniors too.

What. A. Mess.

Thousands of words have been written about the cancellation of the U18 Girls and it's hard to say anything that hasn't already been said. I think the thing that gets me the most is that it feels like the IIHF just doesn't get that the way girls and womens hockey fans feel about our iteration of the game is the exact same way that boys and mens hockey fans feel about that iteration of the game. Full stop.

It should not be surprising that if the girls tourney gets cancelled repeatedly, you will get absolutely dragged by fans, leading to a petition with over 80,000 signatures calling for the tournament to postponed to a safe time, not cancelled completely. And eventually, the media ARE going to get involved and start talking about it too, furthering the bad look to the IIHF.

So here we are.  I'm completely confused why the IIHF published the statement they did defending the decision. It was like they took the worst part of the IIHF interview they did with president Luc Tardif and then blasted that piece of it on Twitter. Why on earth?

It's not great because it demonstrates some of the issues within the growth of hockey, but USA Hockey may step in and save the U18 tourney, hosting in 2022 rather than 2023. The Swedes aren't interested in rescheduling apparently which is also not a good look. If USA Hockey can step in and save it, great, but I have to think USA Hockey and Hockey Canada get tired of basically holding up the structure of women's hockey. Good for them though; in the previous debacle when politician Iain Rankin took down the Women's Worlds (I know, I know, he was trying to do what was right) Hockey Canada saved the day by moving it to Calgary. It doesn't go unnoticed.

But like I say, I just wish the hockey world understood how much women's fans love our game. Seeing the reaction after covid took down the men's tourney...it was like looking in a mirror! It sucks to have your stuff canceled, eh? 

But as an aside, in their defense of cancelling the U18 girls, IIHF did share some things they've been up to for girls and women's hockey. Now, why this isn't widely promoted in the first place instead of shared when in crisis mode, I'm not sure. But here are a few good things: I'm not giving cookies, because some of this just rights long standing wrongs, but I'm also happy to read about this. 

1- the Senior Women's World Championship is going to be played annually now, no longer skipping the Olympic year. GREAT. Can't wait to watch when Denmark hosts in 2022 starting August 26.

2- The IIHF is going to push to expand the Olympic tourney to 12 teams 

3- IIHF has tripled Olympic support, including prize money

4- IIHF Women's Committee will have one of biggest budgets of all committees

Tardif was the founding president of the French Ice Hockey Federation (2006) and says he was instrumental in providing support to women's hockey there. I wouldn't know if he was or wasn't. I do know that France is producing some badass women's hockey players like Chloe Aurard who is a senior forward at #3 Northeastern University.

So....I hate what the IIHF did last week cancelling a top level girl tourney and not the boys (at first). I think they were rightly shredded for that, and I love the women's hockey world for fighting back. I wish the IIHF understood how much people love the women's game, and sure hope this tourney eventually gets played.

But Tardif asked to be judged at the end of the story, not the middle. I will grant him that, perhaps foolishly, but nonetheless. He's a few months into a job, he's done some good things for girls hockey, done one crappy thing that he still has a chance to fix, and of course there is a global pandemic even if we are all tired of it. 


https://www.iihf.com/en/news/31418/addressing_tournament_cancellations

Monday, May 3, 2021

Women’s Hockey Hat Trick

I can’t believe it but the Women’s World Championships got canceled. It turns out a Covid zero zone is not the best place for a women’s hockey tourney. Because cases spiked at the wrong time, and poof there went the tourney. Definitely frustrating to see people finger wag at people about health first, and taking a “screw you world, we don’t want you in our province stance.... “ I mean yes, health first, but why did you ever agree to host the world if it turns out you have a Covid zero policy, and only like cheering for hockey that happens elsewhere? God the adversaries women’s hockey ends up with. Who would have thought that this go round it would be the newly minted premier of Nova Scotia who derails things? But yes, health first, I just REALLY would like to watch some women’s hockey at some point.

The players were devastated, understandably. IIHF took a lot of heat, Iain Rankin took some heat, Hockey Canada somehow came through pretty unscathed in the court of public opinion, but they now have to find a new location somewhere in Canada at the end of August. In theory (oh God) by August there should be lots of safe places to host the tourney. Canada will be swimming in vaccine by then hopefully and all vaxxed up and ready to cheer in person. Have to abandon Halifax at this point; they’ve deferred or cancelled 3 times (including last year, understandably). So that’s unfortunate but it is what it is. At least we’re getting a tourney, albeit an end of summer one.

But that’s not all your getting. I also figured out what to call my links posts: Women’s Hockey Hat Trick. What do you think? Pretty good eh? Here’s a hat trick of links to read and listen to this week:

Read:

The tourney will now be played August 20 -31, 2021, somewhere in Canada, lol.

Saulnier posted one of the first and very best reactions to the canceling, from players. Gabriella Fundaro caught up with her a week later to check in some more.

Listen:
I can’t tell you how much I love that former stars in women’s hockey are becoming more visible in the sport. The ‘99er’s are visible, so too should be hockey’s 98’s. Weinberg Hughes is of course a famous hockey mom, but before that she was a Team USA hockey player and won a silver medal at World’s in 1992. She shared stories about playing hockey in Dallas growing up, being recruited for soccer and choosing a school with hockey too (UNH) and walking on to the hockey team. She’s a great story teller, and moms and hockey moms will love what she has to say. Give it a listen!

Monday, April 19, 2021

Remember Women's Hockey Wednesday?

 A few years back there were a couple of bloggers by the screen name of Nafio and Annie who ran a weekly feature on Pension Plan Puppets called Women's Hockey Wednesday. They'd opine about something for a few paragraphs, then share links to all things women's hockey from the past week. It was integral to me becoming a practicing women's hockey fan. I mean I was raised on hockey, but like so many women's players, when the playing days were done, that was the end, or so I thought. Today I love being a women's hockey fan. Just like the sport needs players, coaches, refs, media, sponsors and more....it also needs fans, just like me. And fans need coverage to consume. 

After many years, Nafio and Annie stepped away from WHW, and nothing has ever really replaced it. I miss it. I remember when I discovered it, there was already more than a year of WHW archives, and I just worked my way through months of links. It's where I learned about Fran Rider and got introduced to the history of women's hockey in Ontario. And so much more. 

What I loved more than anything about WHW was the message it sent about Women's Hockey: You Matter. Women's hockey stories matter. People are writing them, if not on a dedicated women's hockey site, scattered all over the internet, but writing them none the less. Women's hockey was worthy of having those stories rounded up and linked to, and celebrated. I went back to Pension Plan Puppets yesterday to see if WHW had ever been reincarnated. Not yet.

I'm sure you can tell where this is going. I want to share some links with you! 

But first, on the topic of people mattering. You know who matters? The US Women's National Team. Last week on the first day of camp before 2021 Worlds their head coach resigned. The tl;dr version is that it appears he didn't want to deal with stringent Covid protocols required with coaching at Worlds this year, and so he resigned. Resigning in and of itself is fine, it's a thing that happens. People despise Covid protocols and are so over this global pandemic. Also a thing. But resigning 3 weeks before the tourney? I mean really. 

How would you feel as a player if your coach walked away from you like that? What is the message that is being sent?

The World Championships is Women's Hockey's Stanley Cup. NHL coaches aren't walking away from Stanley Cup contenders 3 weeks before playoffs. Why? Because they get it, and they are all in, and will do anything to help the team win. USA Hockey needs to find the USWNT a coach who values them. The team matters, they are special for what they represent in women's hockey, and they deserve better.

Some links:

Read:

Shattuck St. Mary's is adding a 2nd U19 Girls Prep team, the only school in the country to have two U19 teams. They won their first National Championship in 2005, same year as USA won its first World Championship. Neither SSM or the USWNT has slowed down since. To learn about women's hockey, is to learn about this little hockey school.

https://www.s-sm.org/live/news/1357-shattuck-st-marys-school-continues-advancing-girls

Listen:

Jocelyne Lamoureux-Davidson on "On the Bus with Cammi and AJ." Lamoureux, Granato, and Mleckzo have a great chat about many topics, including the Lamoureux twins' new book, "Dare to Make History: Chasing a Dream and Fighting for Equity." 

https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/jocelyne-lamoureux-davidson-former-member-us-national/id1546162389?i=1000512026263

Watch:

Marie-Philip Poulin on Top of Her Game, with Tara Slone. Poulin talks about making her way in hockey as a child, and who she plays for now. (about 15 mins)

https://www.sportsnet.ca/hockey/video/marie-philip-poulin-inspiring-future-generations-womens-hockey-players/

Natalie Spooner on Top of Her Game, with Tara Slone. Spooner is so comfortable in front of the camera. Great energy. (about 15 mins)

 https://www.sportsnet.ca/olympics/video/natalie-spooner-team-canada-inspiring-next-generation/

Friday, April 9, 2021

St. Louis is Next Stop on the PWHPA Secret Dream Gap Tour

 On Sunday and Monday of this week the PWHPA will have a Dream Gap Tour stop in St. Louis. Great news is that Sunday will be streamed, and Monday will be properly broadcast on NBCSN.

I'll watch Monday night's game for sure. I'm curious to see what the level of play is. The teams are USWNT heavy, and with World's less than a month away staying healthy needs to be of utmost priority for the players, but they still need to be ready to go and not picking up bad habits by holding back. 

The teams are light on defenders, four on one roster and five on the other. Particularly in penalty killing scenarios (especially if defender is in the box), this is pretty light. I was curious if the rosters for D had changed at all compared to the last Secret Dream Gap Tour stop, since I had heard Kacey Bellamy was added to the Women's Sports Foundation team roster. However, when I looked at the rosters on the PWHPA site, they were the same as they'd been presented for previous showcases. So I'm sure Bellamy will be added, but not sure of any other changes. 

So as far as defense, here's what we are looking at (4 and 6 now):

Women's Sports Foundation: Jincy Dunne, Megan Keller, Codie Cross, Jacquie Greco, Kali Flanagan, Kacey Bellamy

adidas: Demi Crossman, Savannah Harmon, Margo Lund, Lee Stecklein


...ha. Effing Covid, I just went to twitter to confirm Bellamy is on WSF team and there's a postponement notice posted just now on PW's twitter. I'm sure the mature response from me is platitudes about health and safety and YES, 100%. But also....this really sucks. What a brutal year it's been. Women's games are rare events at the highest level. Even rarer that they get on tv. Even rarer still in Covid times. Post graduate players have not played a tournament since 2019. I won't believe that Worlds is real until the Championship is handed out.

But in the spirit of holding onto optimism, I underlined the World Championship rostered defenders above. In addition to the underlined above, the US will take Caroline Harvey, Cayla Barnes, Megan Bozek and Natalie Buchbinder, for a total of 8 defenders. Fingers crossed the tourney happens.

Saturday, March 13, 2021

On Penn State not making the NCAA Tournament

In the past week there has been a lot said and written about 2 of the at large selections for the NCAA Tournament in women's ice hockey. In this post, I will focus on the Penn State vs Providence comparison. 

One of the arguments against Penn State has been that the CHA is not magically better this year, and does not all of a sudden deserve two bids. Robert Morris grabbed the CHA auto bid with an upset in the conference tourney. The question then becomes, is Penn State worthy of an at large bid? The question is not, is the CHA worthy of two bids?

Fans argue that Hockey East is stronger than the CHA. While I agree that on average Hockey East is stronger than the CHA, that's not the question. The question is, in a Providence vs Penn State comparison, who meets more of the stated criteria? Ultimately the committee felt Providence did. 

If we look strictly at criteria below, as printed in the Championship Manual, I try to do an analysis of who meets each criteria. I'm not sure how the committee does this, but am trying to make sense of it.

The criteria to determine selections are as follows (in no particular order):

Won/Loss Record - Penn State wins point

Strength of Schedule - Providence wins point

Head to Head Results (when available) - na

Results versus Common Opponents - na

Quality Wins - I can't find definition of this (and suspect it's full of math I don't want to learn how to do), but likely Providence gets this point considering 2 wins over BC. Penn State did not get the chance to earn any quality wins due to their schedule not containing any games against teams in the top 10. It's very unfortunate if this is what it came down to, but it also feels unfair to not give Providence credit for their wins. If the committee took the stance they didn't want to disregard the Providence quality wins, it also seems they took the stance they COULD disregard the head to head wins of Minnesota over UMD. This seems inconsistent. If the committee wants to strictly go by criteria in one comparison, they open themselves to criticism by being subjective in another. I included subjective arguments for Penn State, further in this post.

Home / Away Weighting - not considered by me

Eligibility and Availability of Student Athletes - na

Penn State had the better Won/Loss Record, while Providence had a stronger strength of schedule. The only other relevant criteria is Quality Wins. I wonder if that's the point that Providence got that Penn State didn't. Since Penn State may not have got the chance to earn quality wins, when BC did, it feels a bit unfair but maybe this is the best the committee could do. 

I didn't consider Home/Away weighting because that's getting pretty nitty gritty and I can't believe the analysis came down to that. Hopefully eventually an explanation will come from the committee, and hopefully the criteria are consistently applied to both the scenario above, and the Minnesota UMD scenario.

Two final points: 

It's not a criteria for NCAA Tournament Selection, but Penn State versus Providence comparison of previous years reveals that Penn State has been .500 against Hockey East in recent years, and has a winning record versus Providence specifically. Providence has a losing record against Penn State, and has been .500 against CHA in recent years. For the purpose of this year's NCAA Tournament it's a moot point, but for the purposes of speaking factually about the accomplishments of Penn State and the CHA versus Providence, it's relevant. It is disingenuous for knowledgeable college hockey fans to speak of a team as though it is nothing more or less than the general reputation of its league. There's nuance that should be considered, and the committee could have chose to do that.

If the pairwise existed this year, it's entirely possible that Penn State would have earned an at large bid. I looked at Mercyhurst’s results the last time they earned an at large bid. It was 2014 and their results were eerily similar to what Penn State did this year, including a late season tie to Lindenwood and getting knocked out of CHA tourney by RIT. Reg season results were 15-3-2 (Penn State was 16-2-2 this year) and non conference was 7-5 (na this year). Mercyhurst made the tourney as an at large on strength of their pairwise. Of course their were 3 auto bids then, not 4, but also there was more teams because everyone was playing. So assuming there was a pairwise this year and assuming Coach Kampersal hadn’t loaded up Penn State's schedule with six games against best WCHA teams...Penn State really might have made the tourney as an at large based on math or if not they would have been very close.


Tuesday, February 23, 2021

PWHPA to be broadcast on NHL Network and Sportsnet

The PWHPA announced today that their Sunday game at Madison Square Garden will be broadcast on NHL Network and Sportsnet. This is great news, and also my cue to subscribe to NHL Network again. I finally let it lapse last March, when the World Championships were cancelled, and it was apparent there would be no women's hockey for a while. The NHL Network has broadcast several women's games the past few years, and hopefully will expand on this in the future. Seeing a PW game on the slate is a great sign.

With today's announcement we are now on the eve of a lot of great hockey which will be broadcast. PW will be broadcast this weekend (Feb 28) as mentioned above. Next weekend when they do a showcase in Chicago, they will be on NBC Sportsnet. That one will be history making, as it's the first time they will be broadcast on Network tv in the US.

College hockey conference tourneys start this weekend and wrap up next weekend, and of course college hockey all has pretty decent streams. This leads us right into the National Championship, a two weekend tourney, the 2nd of which will (I assume) be broadcast on Big Ten Network as in years past. And THEN, Worlds. So we've got a good stretch here on tv, after some barren times.

Last February the Rivalry Series wrapped up in Anaheim at Honda Center in front of a history making crowd. Those darn Americans won in OT AGAIN, and while I love the drama of the rivalry, I'm always looking for my Canadian girls to win against America. But February 2020, that's a long time ago. Can't wait to watch on Sunday.

The rosters are mostly American players, or at the very least, players who are training in the US. Covid travel complications of course. It's Minnesota's Hub vs New Hampshire's Hub. Rosters are on the PW website, but I think the Minnesota roster has more offensive fire power for sure. Cameranesi, Knight, Brandt, Pankowski and Roque on Minnesota have that roster looking strong. Minnesota goalies are both Olympians - Rooney and Hensley. Total of 17 on the roster, 15 skaters.

Over on New Hampshire, well their roster is also amazing, but I don't think it matches Minnesota in scoring power. They also have 17 on the roster, 15 skaters. The real excitement over there is their defenders. Jincy Dunne graduated from Ohio State just last year, and on her last collegiate play of her career sprung an Ohio State forward on a rush in OT that win them their first ever WCHA Tourney Championship. I've always wanted to see Dunne on the ice with Olympians and looking at who she'll have to defend against in the Minnesota PW squad should give us a great look. Luckily she'll also have Megan Keller on her team to defend against Minnesota. New Hampshire has Alex Cavallini in net as well as Katie Burt. 

So Burt is the only non Olympian goalie in this mix. She's the young kid trying to oust a Hensley or a Cavallini I suppose, which there are no guarantees of, plus Aerin Frankel in college is trying to make that USA squad too, and Frankel is absolutely crushing it, recently posting 6 consecutive shutouts. So Burt is going to need some playing time. The question is if the Sunday night game is to be televised, are they going to share time for the goalies, or treat like a real game. My guess is the Saturday night, they give some playing time to all four goalies, but come Sunday, unless something wild happens in Saturday's game, we'll see Rooney vs Cavallini. Rooney played in the 2018 Olympic gold medal game of course, and Cavallini played most of the 2019 Worlds and also looked amazing, helping USA win gold. 

All of this PW stuff is against the backdrop of their pursuit of a viable league, but we also know every time these athletes step on the ice it's a tryout for their respective National Teams. With so few games for some of these women in the past almost two years now I don't really know what to expect in terms of sustained crispness and cohesion especially at 5 on 5. It will be good hockey I have no doubt, but it won't be near Olympic level I don't think. Nonetheless, the PW on NHL Network and Sportsnet will be passionate, quality hockey, and a welcome sight to women's hockey fans. 




Saturday, February 20, 2021

Back into it

I drifted away from sports fandom in the past 12 months. For starters there was nothing really happening in women's sports, just one cancellation after another. And the pandemic has simultaneously left us with nothing to do, and yet also made us so busy what with the inefficiencies of working, parenting, and helping a child with school at the same time. 

It's funny, when I leave something for a while, I forget how much I love it. To return to the sport, even as a fan, is to be reminded of how much I enjoy it. 

The NW bubble was announced, and I thought yes I'll watch that, stream it on Twitch and put it on the tv. The game I watched was the Toronto Minnesota one, Saturday night. It felt like I was watching Hockey Night in Canada in a way. Lindsay Eastwood, who I used to watch on Syracuse and who had victimized my Lakers too many times was especially fun to watch. Her and Grant-Mentis were great together on the PP, leading to Grant-Mentis' first goal of the night. Every time Toronto scored, Minnesota would answer. Toronto would then grab the lead back and so on. I thought for sure the game was headed to OT, but Grant-Mentis scored again to win it with about thirty seconds left. She came up with a puck just inside the offensive blue line, walked around one defender and when the whole building was thinking pass, Grant-Mentis was thinking, let's just end this, and shot. What a game.

The game ended, Grant-Mentis a hero, the Toronto Six looking like potential future Isobel Cup winners. I turned the tv off, abandoned the mess of wrestling action figures my son had dug out while we played during the game and put him to bed. I sat down at my computer and started to work, (I feel like I should explain working on a Saturday night, but you probably get it, it's the pandemic lifestyle basically) And while I worked, for the first time in a year, I turned on a hockey podcast, a Canadian one, a big budget one with kickass music at the end that gets you pumped, or keeps you pumped, if you already are. Women's hockey is back, and so am I.

Here's Lindsay Eastwood scoring the Six's first ever goal. The season's on pause, naturally, but the Six are full of promise and the NW is planning on finishing the season, so who knows where this might lead.

https://www.sportsnet.ca/hockey/video/lindsay-eastwood-scores-first-goal-toronto-six-history/



 

Friday, December 25, 2020

Freshmen Class 2020-2021

 Believe it or not, I'm still here. 2020 was quite the year. I'll leave it at that and let's talk a little hockey. The Lakers introduced the current freshmen class back in the fall of 2019. For my sake, because I've been away and frankly detached from sports in general, let's run who through we got. There are seven freshmen and a transfer.

Grace Nelles - Grace is a forward and has Canada U18 experience, and is the most pedigreed of the freshmen. Her sister Sarah is a junior on the team already. Nelles hails from St. Ann's Ontario, Stoney Creek Sabres (PWHL).

Sarah Boucher - Boucher is a forward from Burlington Ontario, and played for the Oakville Hornets (PWHL). 

Jersey Phillips - almost a local player, Phillips is from Cheektowaga, NY. Getting more and more Western New York players over the years, although the original Western New Yorker on the team, would be Coach Sisti himself, also from Cheektowaga. Phillips played for the Buffalo Regals (Tier 1).

Mary Kromer - another forward, another wester New Yorker, being from Angola NY. Interestingly, she played her hockey in the PWHL for the Stoney Creek Sabres.

Paige Whaley - Whaley is from Carlisle, Ontario (basically Hamilton) and played for the Etobicoke Junior Dolphins (PWHL). 

Chantal Ste-Croix - Ste-Croix is the sixth and final forward of the group, from Brampton, ON and also played for the Junior Lakers...I mean the Stoney Creek Junior Sabres of the PWHL. For years, I have thought the Lakers had Stoney Creek pipeline, and have never felt it more than this year with three of seven freshmen being alums of that program. Other Lakers with Stoney Creek experience: Sarah Nelles, Alexa Vasko, Rachel Marmen, and Meagan Korzack. 

Calista Rowbottom - Rowbottom is a D from Missouri, who played her high school hockey in Dallas. Have to think she is the first Missourian (is that right) on the team. I would not have guessed that Missouri kids would play their high school hockey in Texas, which might say something about my geography knowledge. Always gets me when I hear AZ kids played in Colorado too. Colorado, not as north as one might think.

The last newcomer is Ena Nystrom, a sophomore transfer from RPI, and who lives in Norway. Nystrom plays for the Norwegian National Team. She's a goalie and after playing for the mightily struggling RPI who went winless last year, Mercyhurst will be a whole different world for her.

So there you have it, 6 forwards, 1 defender and 1 goalie. 4 Canadians, 3 Americans and 1 Norwegian, and as always a PWHL heavy class (5 out of 8). The Lakers sit at 2-0 on this pandemic season, and have their next game scheduled for January 2nd, vs Adrian.



Tuesday, December 17, 2019

5 Takeaways from Game 1 of the USA Canada Rivalry Series

USA took game one of the Rivalry Series against Canada on Saturday, in Hartford Connecticut. Canada opened the scoring with a power play goal from Victoria Bach, but USA came away with a 4-1 decision on goals power play goals from Megan Keller and Amanda Kessel, and even strength goals from Abby Roque and Alex Carpenter. Alex Cavallini (USA) and Genevieve Lacasse (Canada) each got the start in net.

5 takeaways:

1- Fluid roster construction: IIHF events are the crown jewels in international women's hockey. It is clear the Rivalry Series and other non IIHF events are used as evaluating tools, as we see the pool of players used grow and grow. Since the 2018 Four Nations there have been five events: Four Nations, Feb 2019 Rivalry Series, Worlds, Pittsburgh Camp, and Dec 2019 Rivalry Series. The US has iced a total of 43 different players in its various 23 person rosters for those events. From a viewer's perspective the more college hockey you watch, the more context you have for what you are watching. I loved watching on Saturday, but definitely had to look up some players.

I made a google drive sheet here to track the US Rosters for this quad: Team USA Roster for 2018-2022 Quad 
Apologies for the formatting, still figuring it out. 8 players have been in 100% of events (Knight, Kessel, Coyne, Matheson, Cavallini, Cameranesi, Bellamy, and Bozek) and 9 have been in 80% . So it looks like there are about 6 spots up for grabs. Also of note is the continued dominance of BC, Wisconsin and Minnesota college players in US Roster construction. 25 of 43 players attend or attended these schools. I'd like to add graduation date to my google sheet as it appears team USA is trending pretty young right now, and very comfortable loading up with college kids. I suspect the January portion of the roster will have fewer college kids out of respect to their college schedules.

2- Finding Canada's next starting goaltender: Canada has relied on Shannon Szabados for years, including the 2018 Olympics where she played with a leg injury and the 2018 Four Nations, 2019 Rivalry Series and Worlds. But she wasn't at Pittsburgh and isn't on the current Canada roster. One gets the sense Canada is trying to find their new number one. On Saturday 30 year old Genevieve Lacasse played just ok. She didn't give up any egregious goals, but four goals is simply a lot. I would have liked to see her get a stick on the Pankowski pass across the crease to Keller on the first power play goal. On Roque's goal Lacasse probably made the high percentage play by going to her knees, but it appeared she didn't track the puck well off the face off, and Roque had no problem going backhand top shelf. Ultimately Lacasse gave up four goals on 31 shots. Ann-Renee Desbiens or Emerance Maschmeyer (both 25) are likely to get the start on Tuesday.

3- Quiet night for Canada's stars and veterans: Although shots were even on the night, and Canada showed promise in the second when it outshot the US 15-9, Canada looked rusty at finishing and too many veterans weren't being impact players. Spooner, Johnson, and Saulnier didn't stand out much. Poulin was ok but was held off the score sheet. Agosta made her debut post maternity leave and looked about what you would expect, a very reasonable performance from her. Agosta did have one glorious back door chance towards end of the 2nd period. She couldn't put it home, which is a shame, because we didn't see much more of her after that. The third period was all USA and they finished two even strength chances which made the difference. I still give Canada every chance of winning tonight in game two in New Brunswick, particularly if anyone other than Cavallini starts for the US.

Perhaps the best Canada gif of the night was this, Poulin just trucking somebody. Man she is sturdy on her skates. It's deceiving as she doesn't look like a big player.



4 - Abby Roque, a senior at Wisconsin was one of 6 players making their senior team debut for the US. She got regular ice time, and scored early in the third period to make it 3-1 and take the wind out of any Canadian push to tie the game. The play started with Abby winning a face off in the offensive zone against Victoria Bach. Bach is a bit indecisive about how to react, doesn't tie up Abby enough, and after the puck ping pongs to Abby she deftly protects the puck with her body and goes backhand top shelf. Beautiful goal, and it reminded me of Pankowski's (another former Badger) short handed back handed shelf goal in the National Championship game in March. They must practice that at Wisconsin. :) For Canada, it was a tough goal against. Bach, a 2018 graduate of BU is showing lots of offensive promise on the senior team for Canada, and her offensive prowess is earning her the right to be on the ice in the third, down a goal, but this had to be a learning moment for her. All of this only enhances the excitement that will play out on the ice tonight in New Brunswick.



5- My 4 stars of the game are Alex Cavallini, Alex Carpenter, the @wsportshilites twitter handle and the NBC production. NBC did have one mix up where they listed Roque as Canadian (I wish!) and somehow forgot Pankowski was a member of the 2019 Championship winning Badger team, but on the whole I enjoyed the call by John Walton, and the color by AJ Mleczko. I enjoyed that they showed the '98 Olympians drop the puck, and enjoyed all the photographic stills of women's hockey legends from years past. There is simply no comparison between watching a professional production, and anything else other than watching live. Here's a highlight package showing some great Cavallini saves as evidence of the above.



Sunday, November 24, 2019

First Strides

A year ago we took our then 4 year old daughter to a Try Hockey For Free event. She was already sort of skating and we knew she would love it. She did, and so did her brother. Problem was, he was only 2 years old, too young for the event. He cried and cried because he so badly wanted to go on the ice. Finally he calmed down but it was all I could do to keep on the sidelines watching.


A year has gone by. He’s got his first set of skates and at 3 years old is too young for most programs. I would never in a million years enroll him in anything except... the kid is wild for hockey, for sports in general. When he watches sports live or on tv, he plays by himself, and is part of the play in his own way. He sees his sister go off to organized sports and it is agonizing for him. He wants to play, wants to be like her.

And so, he is now enrolled in tot hockey at our local rink. The programming is incredible, how patient they are with the various sets of circumstances each new hockey player has. Here he is on his first day of tot hockey, from this weekend:



That’s him getting help with his mitts. He was quite stationary during the lesson, despite the encouragement from his coach and the fact that I’ve seen him push one of those things around before.

 I’ve seen so many kids learn to skate with those but my kids just hung on them like a crutch. My daughter eventually got the basics of balance and motion figured out on roller skates, then it transferred easily to ice.  

My son, I took him back today and we practiced marching on skates around the ice, holding his hand as we went. I taught him to bend his knees and put his hands out like wings of airplane if he thought he was going to fall. Of course he did fall, so I taught him to kneel on one knee, put hands on his knee and push up to standing. Sometimes I skated backwards and held both his hands while he skated forwards. Eventually I put a gap between us, outstretched my arms and encouraged him to skate. He eventually took his first strides, unassisted. I really loved that moment. It’s his fifth time on the ice. No more walker. Just stomp stomp glide a few feet at a time and soon, all over the ice.

Sunday, November 17, 2019

Hayley Wickenheiser to be Inducted; and Our 2019 Visit to the Hockey Hall of Fame

Tomorrow night Hayley Wickenheiser, will be inducted into the hockey hall of fame, the seventh woman to receive such honors. As Angela James has joked, almost a full table now!

Wickenheiser enters the hall with four Olympic golds, and one Olympic silver medal. I could not find the IIHF point totals but I understand she's number 1. I was able to see that in 87 games played in the WWC/ OG she had 137 points, an average of 1.57 points per game. Not only that she has a long list of diverse non hockey accomplishments, resulting in her being called Canada's renaissance woman. At the end of this post, I have shared links to some of the coverage she received in the last week and after her retirement. If you haven't read any of it yet, dive in. The video from TSN includes hockey highlights, as well.

Although I knew Wickenheiser's name as a teenager in the late nineties, the only memories I have of watching her play are the 2014 Olympics. Going into those Olympics, there was a question of whether Wickenheiser still had it. She definitely did. She played on a top line, had five points in the tournament, and was on the ice in OT in that gold medal game, getting a breakaway and drawing a penalty even. I didn't realize this, but Mike Murphy points out she was on the ice providing a screen for Poulin, for her gold medal winning goal in Sochi.

Her humility was tested, as the captaincy was transferred to Ouellette for those Games, but Wickenheiser's play on the ice showed an athlete devoted towards a common goal: gold for Canada. I don't know what the greatest thing Wickenheiser ever did was, but on ice it may have been that she simply changed our understanding of what women hockey players are capable of. She showed us a level of competition, physicality, shooting skill and devotion to being the best, that the game had not seen before. In the stars we see today - their unabashed compete level, physicality and skill, devotion to the game, - we see Hayley's legacy.

In college, my coach always talked about killer instinct, trying to get us to have it, unearth it in ourselves. The player I most remember having it, of all the players I played against was Julie Chu. I only played two games against her, but she had it. I believe you can see it not just in the way these players play, but in the way they celebrate, the raw emotion that pours out of them. Chu had it, and Wickenheiser did too. I think it's on display in this 2002 gold medal game goal. There is no risk of her not scoring this goal, she leaves nothing to chance, and she is pumped with the result. Whole video is awesome, but Wickeheiser's goal is at 1:02. You'll need to click through to YouTube because of IOC rules.



I look forward to watching the festivities tomorrow.

***
The Hockey Hall of Fame museum in Toronto is very much worth a visit if you ever have the chance. I've been there 3 or 4 times, which is pretty good for a person from Western Canada I think! In May, I had the chance to take my kids there. It was a really quick visit due to time constraints, but we made it. Here are some pictures and recollections from our visit.


My poor son was so tired after a long day of travel. He had fun, but I went back and forth on whether it was a good idea to cram this visit in, and the visit wasn't without its peaks and valleys for me as a mom. When you are a mom, life is not compartmentalized. My children are at my side in almost everything I do, and it's an incredible gift, but not without challenges. My children are American, but I want them to know what it is to be Canadian, and the Hockey Hall of Fame is certainly one place to learn.

As hockey fans know, Hayley Wickenheiser is mom to Noah, now a young man in Canada's military. There is a famous picture of her holding him when he is a young boy, after the 2002 gold medal game. Such pictures are now common place, but Wickenheiser's is the first I ever saw, yet another way she changed the mold. More than that, I always just thought it was a touching photo.




The interactive games, the showcases with the women's stuff, the Stanley Cup, the display of goalie masks, the main exhibit du jour.....these are the must see's at the Hockey Hall of Fame. Here my children do as I did in the late nineties, test their shooting accuracy! This exhibit has greatly evolved since the late nineties. A popular exhibit, Carey Price and a handful of other NHL goalies got a non stop work out. My kids also loved the TSN Sports Desk. As a child, I remember sitting in a booth, and trying to call the plays on iconic moments in hockey history.




You know Wick is a badass when she already had a display case long before her induction. Sorry for the fingerprints, HHOF. There is a Wickenheiser quote on display that says something like, "Boys would say, girls don't skate, girls don't play hockey. I would say, 'Just watch me.' " My mom read this to my daughter and a part of me wanted to put my hands on her ears. She's innocent, let her be I thought. But you know, I hear my kids lecturing each other all the time on what boys and girls do. It's just their immature way of bickering, and sorting out the world. They've heard me lecture them enough, that my daughter now says, we know, we know, anyone can do anything.  

I think Wick's message is relevant for grownups too. The prospect of organizing a properly funded, viable women's pro hockey league is a daunting one. The haters and naysayers are present. But the women pushing the movement must continue to dream big, work incredibly hard and change the culture around what we believe is possible for pro women's hockey.

This showcase is one of three that I recall dedicated to women's hockey. Manon Rheaume's mask is also featured in the goalie mask exhibit. Must sees for women's hockey fans. Another great exhibit is the Montreal Canadiens dressing room. I think a women's dressing room, representing the gear and stories of 20+ international women's hockey heroes, would also make a poignant display.




My daughter took this picture for me, of the induction book containing the signature of Jayna Hefford, jersey #16 for Team Canada. It means so much to me to see the women enshrined in the Hall.


Every legacy contains its dark days. The Stanley Cup and the Great Hall containing the NHL trophies, the walls covered in bios of inductees is the crown jewel of the Hockey Hall of Fame. That crown jewel is the result of decades of work. In women's hockey, to be blunt as hell - every year has been a lockout, in terms of visibility of the game. Women have put in the work for decades, it is time for brands, governing bodies and women's hockey supporters to lift the game to new heights and unprecedented visibility, with a viable pro women's hockey league.




This pic doesn't do it justice, but here's a sliver of the great hall, with the Stanley Cup. We got our picture with the Cup, and it's displayed on our fridge. My husband dressed the kids that morning....and of course they are both wearing baseball t-shirts. He didn't dress me though, and I proudly repped the Columbus Blue Jackets.

When we were standing in line, my daughter declared she wanted to win the Stanley Cup. It's amazing how dreaming is so natural. I kind of flubbed the answer.....I gave her a lecture on the Clarkson Cup. I did my best, but knowing the right answer for every parenting situation is not easy. I'm trying to let them both just grow up dreaming of winning whatever trophy is in front of them. Besides, although she won't win the Stanley Cup as a player, she could very much still win it. Anyway, she didn't listen to me, and still talks about wanting to win the Stanley Cup. All is well.

The Stanley Cup left an impact on them. As we watched the Stanley Cup playoffs, when they saw the logo on tv, they mentioned the Hall of Fame, and exclaimed "we've seen that." My kids don't understand leagues and levels of play at all. I was flattered when my daughter asked me, during game 7 of the Stanley Cup Finals if I had ever played against the Boston Bruins.


Me, in 1997 at the Hockey Hall of Fame, at the same exhibit my kids shot on 22 years later. We watched a number of people shoot at the exhibit as its very popular. There was a young girl, about 12 years old, who gave it a try. Red tshirt, track pants, little braids in her hair. She casually scored goal after goal on the virtual NHL player she shot against. She was the best of anyone I watched that day. 

When she was done, she turned around and smiled, revealing a mouthful of braces. She fist bumped her dad, and I watched them walk away. It was like watching a living exhibit, another highlight of our visit. No matter the challenges in visibility for women's hockey.....girls hockey players are out there, they always have been, and they are crushing it.


Enjoy the festivities tomorrow, and if you haven't already, enjoy some reading on Hayley Wickenheiser:

Hockey Hall of Fame website:  Hockey Hall of Fame Bio - Wickenheiser

The Ice Garden - A wonderful hockey heavy article.  Origins: How Hayley Wickenheiser Changed the Game

Pension Plan Puppets (2017) a ton of links on Hayley Wickenheiser, after her retirement - Thanks For Everything Wick



TSN (8 min video) - The Doctor is In



I had a hard time finding all time points. If you are interested in  stats, the Ice Garden article by Mike Murphy above, is the best I've seen. Here's a screen shot from Elite Prospects, and the HHOF link includes stats as well. What I can't find is total points scored in a Team Canada uniform. It's also glaring that we need to get more games for our elite women to play. Nonetheless, here's Wickenheiser's stats, per Elite Prospects:






Wednesday, November 13, 2019

Women’s Hockey Holiday Gift Guide 2019

It's the season for holiday gift guides, and so below I offer you some gift ideas for the women's hockey fan in your life. If you yourself are a women's hockey fan and don't receive any of these items as a gift, don't fret. That's the beauty of being a grown up - you just buy it for yourself!

Here we go, women's hockey gift ideas:


Give the gift of women's sports media coverage. Click the link to get to their support pages, and explore their sites.

Victory Press
Make a one time contribution, a monthly contribution in any amount, or buy a t shirt. I finally became a patron a few months ago, and am happy to support their hockey writers.

Burn It All Down Podcast
5 journalists discuss serious topics in women's sports, and drive conversation and reporting that changes the sports world. My Christmas wish is to become a monthly Patron or make a one time contribution.

Hear Her Sports Podcast
A podcast by Elizabeth Emery. The podcast features long-form interviews with female athletes breaking boundaries, speaking up and living with power & confidence. There is an option to donate $50 and receive a notebook from her shop, as well as other items for sale.

Merchandise - Click on the images to get to store.

Hayley Wickenheiser Hockey Hall of Fame T-Shirt:
$22.95 CAD

Cammi Granato or Angela James Hockey Hall of Fame celebratory pucks:
$14.95 CAD each





Offside - A Memoir by Rhonda Leeman Taylor (2019):
$9.80 Amazon

I own this book, and recommend it to people interested in women's hockey history. 



Grindstone Award Classic OG Tee (Grindstone is a Canadian Registered Charity and a portion of proceeds goes to a scholarship to help Canadian girls play hockey):
$30 CAD



Bauer Hockey Women's Movement Never Stops T-Shirt ( All profits go to Play Like a Girl, a 501(c)3 nonprofit organization founded in 2004 that is committed to helping girls experience the joy of sport and physical activity):
$19.99 and free shipping
Link: Click here to purchase Bauer t shirt 






12 Seasons: the Canadian Women's Hockey League Records Book by Richard Scott
$15.50 Amazon

Probably the number one thing on this list that I want.



Who's Who in Women's Hockey Guide 2020 Edition by Richard Scott:
$13.68 Amazon




US Women's Hockey Team (Olympic Stars)
$27.07 Amazon

This is a kids book with simple story telling and fantastic photography, that we borrowed from the library. Young kids can connect with and learn from this book and I appreciated the photography. 


2018 US Olympic Women's Hockey Team Poster 16x20
$17.99 Amazon and free shipping

 Link: Click here to buy poster

Buying this for my kid. Available in multiple sizes.



Buy Tickets to Amazing Hockey

The Rivalry Series: USA vs Canada
Buy tickets to Moncton, Victoria, or Vancouver
Buy tickets to Hartford or Anaheim
Hartford - Dec 14
Moncton - Dec 17
Victoria - Feb 3
Vancouver - Feb 5
Anaheim - Feb 8

2020 Women's World Championships - March 31 to April 10 in Halifax and Truro, Nova Scotia

Tickets to 2020 WWC

Sunday, November 10, 2019

Recap of watching USA vs Canada on Friday

We went to the USA Canada game in Pittsburgh on Friday and it was, to no one's surprise, a great time.


After making the hour and a half drive from Cleveland we arrived around six at the UPMC Lemieux Sports Center. It's a beautiful facility, opened in 2015. When we first got inside I was worried because there were long lines for ticketing. However, we had already printed our tickets so we were good to go, no line at all. The others were processed timely I'm sure; I just lack patience so I'm glad we didn't have to wait in line.

To the left of the entrance is The Training Table restaurant where, we got dinner. This was clutch as not all rinks are set up like this. We got hotdogs, soft pretzels, fruit cups and chocolate milk. Might sound like a silly detail but if you've ever tried to feed your kids a meal at a rink you know this is pretty good! To get to Training Table you walk under an archway with the famous Badger Bob Hockey quote: "It's a Great Day for Hockey!" The Training Table has tables to eat at which was nice for us as a family, and it looked out onto the rink where the women would play. 5 Stanley Cup banners hung from the rafters, just incredible, when you think what a feat winning one Stanley Cup is, let alone five.

The archway off to the right had images of hockey players from a very young age, up to an NHLer. One of the images was of a little girl hockey player. I think on the right side is another rink. The facility is huge but I didn't check it out. My husband said they had some cool Mario Lemieux stuff back there.... but when I am out at these things I try to focus on the kids and the game. I have to give myself a pep talk before I go that as much as I want it to be about me...it's probably in my best interest to not try to do it "all".

There were programs, game notes, and printed rosters all available for free. This was great as I couldn't find any of this at the Rivalry Series in Detroit last year.

After dinner we went and watched warmups. The rink itself is a standard NHL practice facility, with bleacher seats on one side, but still a first class facility even though "bleacher seats" is not fancy. I'd guess 800 seats? We sat in the end where US warmed up, and where Canada shot on for 2 periods. It turned out that was the perfect place to sit. One of my takeaways watching the women warmup is just how well the all shoot the puck. Most of the women are not that heavy; I don't know what the average weight is but I don't it's more than 160 pounds. But damn they can wire the puck! The other thing about a live game is you get to notice all the details. The uniforms are so beautiful....I love seeing that up close. I wish I could have gone down and watched Canada warm up, but maybe next time. Better for my kids to watch their Americans warm up I suppose. 

I hope it goes without saying, that I find it really special just to watch these ladies. My heart is always with Canada, but I am also cheering for pretty much every woman on the ice. I think it's my mom heart, my sentimental old lady heart, my grow women's hockey heart, my dual citizen heart.  But let it be known: WWC 2020: It's Canada's time!!!!!!! Gold or bust.

Our seats ended up being great. We had the Pittsburgh Puffins and (I think) the Hagerstown Mayhem to our left. These are women's teams. They were a little rowdy (that's a compliment) and every hockey game needs that. If I wasn't with my kids I would have gone and joined them! In front of us was a family that we chatted with. They play at the same rink in Cleveland area as us, and they mentioned Mercyhurst as a school they'd love for their daughter to play at. As an alum, you know I puffed up with pride! Hockey people are pretty great for the most part, and I was invited to come join a co-ed league in NEO. I can't tell you how often this happens. For all the negatives in hockey, the reality is there is a ton of good, people who are working together to create opportunities, for the good of the game and people's enjoyment.

To our right and on the glass were some VIPs in my opinion. The Johnstown Warriors girls hockey team is the first all girls hockey team in 53 years of their organization (from chatting with a mom). The girls are 2010's and 2009's I believe...because I was talking to one 2011 who was telling me she is on the practice squad but next year gets to be on the team. So sweet. A 2010 birth year is about 9 years old, and I can tell you to have an all girls team at that age is a huge accomplishment for whoever is running that organization.

So I sat amidst this crowd with my husband and 5 and 3 year old. The fans were accommodating; we were crammed in and you know kids were fussing here and there. My son is extremely active and his flag waving skills frankly need some work. He also doesn't stop talking and chatted with half the arena.

The puck drop was done by Brianne McLaughlin Bittle. McLaughlin Bittle is a 2x Olympian who was born in Cleveland area, went to college at Robert Morris and helped build that program. She also led the Buffalo Beauts to their NWHL Championship, and is now very involved in growing girls hockey in Pittsburgh. She had her baby son in her arms as she did the puck drop. Really nice choice to have her do the honors.

Then the hockey game. Oh man. It was unreal. I loved it, and Canada looked really really good. Be encouraged Canada - there were 18 US players that were on the 2019 WWC Gold squad, so this was a legit USA team, and Canada crushed them. Let's just check the fun storylines:
Return of MPP - she was amazing, goal and an assist as you know. That first goal that Bach put in, was all created by MPP. As soon as you saw MPP draw all the US players onto her and thread a pass across to a streaking Bach, you saw Rooney commit, and knew Bach only had to step around her and bury it. Incredible return by MPP from her injury; she looked great. She was on a line with Bach and Clark; CWHL rookie of the year Bach had a break out night. Great work by her.
The future is bright: 36-10-15 (Gabel Fillier Daoust) was a very fun line to watch. Gabel's awareness that like 4 US players were on one side of the ice as the Canadians were set up in the US zone, and then to see her saucer a pass over to Fillier in the slot, who quickly released a hard shot into the net was cool to see. This line includes a 2x National Champion and Patty Kaz winner (Gabel), USports poster girl and 2018 Olympic MVP (Daoust), and Fillier is an Ivy Leager and was the National Rookie of the Year in NCAA last year. The marketability is endless.  
Knighter reminds us of her greatness: Am I allowed to call her Knighter? Doubtful. Anyway, these 2 are the biggest names in women's hockey. They always deliver, and even in a USA loss, Knight buried a puck. Neutral zone rush where she fed (Pfalzer) Matheson, and then Knight glided in her lurking way to the net and tapped a puck out of air into the net. She's a beast. Love to watch her.
The Lam Twins: Monique got more ice time than Jocelyne as far as I could tell. This makes sense considering Monique was on defense and also these two have, literally, infants, and so the six weeks difference in the age of their babies likely is still reflected in terms of where they are at in recovery. Monique led the US in shots. Total beast, she came close to scoring a couple. But that was a very compelling storyline nonetheless, to see these women get themselves back to form and back on the ice.
The US Power Play: Holy give aways! An aggressive Canadian PK led to two breakaways. One resulted in a short handed goal. Spooner also got a breakaway and she beat Rooney but the puck then hit the post.

The US' best period was the 2nd. They played better than Canada that period but the PP breakdown, and a weird "throw it on net" shot by Bach had the Canadians win that one on the score board.

I really thought Cayla Barnes scored a goal in the second on the power play, but I'm told that replay showed it didn't go in. You know us fans enjoyed getting worked up regardless. The energy in the crowd at that time was really great. It was everything you want in a hockey game. Today's game should be amazing, because the US can't be satisfied with what they did on Friday.

By the third period, the kids were a bit antsy. It was late and we had gotten there an hour before the game started, and that was after an hour and a half car drive. Apparently mine weren't the only antsy ones, because for the third period a group of about ten kids sat right against the glass where they had room to stretch out and be active and cheer. I really loved seeing it....to me that is a quintessential aspect of being in a hockey rink. I love the way the kids interact with each other, and love to see them enjoy the experience and atmosphere of being at a hockey game. For me, in addition to seeing the rowdy women's team fans, this may have been the off ice highlight of the night for me. I know it wasn't ideal for some people....one dude was visbly frustrated. But I don't know, we were in there like sardines, it was 4-1 and the kids had done a great job thus far and weren't obstructing view in a material way. Play on, kids.

After the game the women did autographs, which is incredibly generous of them. One day we'll stand in line for that, but not quite yet.

I want to acknowledge how amazing the Penguins organization was. They simply went above and beyond. This worked out so well to have the games on days when the Penguins weren't playing so the Penguins literally devoted their social media team to the women. By all appearances, a first class organization. If you want a sense of what I mean, just check out all the content on their website this week.  On their website, they literally have a landing page for women's hockey, under the News drop down. I don't know if this is standard for NHL teams...I doubt it, but I am very impressed. Almost seems like these guys could be a case study for how support could be mimicked throughout the league.

Not that anyone asked me....but I give this experience a 10 out of 10.

I offer 3 ways to make it even better in the future, only because as an hockey player knows.....you are always trying to get better. I regret if this comes across as a total downer after a long positive post, but as a busy person, I just throw down my thoughts on this blog and carry on.

1- sell USA Hockey and Hockey Canada affordable, quality merchandise at these events. Knight and Poulin shirseys should be standard issue. Bring them in all sizes, especially kids sizes. If there was a merch table and I missed it, apologies!

2- include a call to action to get people involved in girls and womens hockey as players and fans, locally. Put the onus on the teams to do the work. Give RMU a chance to promote their program, as well as the Pittsburgh Puffins and local rec womens's teams, etc. The kids of Pittsburgh should know that the National Team doesn't come to town often, but growing up watching RMU play is a pretty badass option too. 

3- It is a shame that is cost $30 to stream this game online. When you consider that this series replaced the 4 Nations that was canceled, and that the final for 4 Nations was streamed free on NHL Network last year......this felt like a step backwards. I wish the powers that be understood how rare and special the opportunity to watch these women play is. When US and Canada women are set to play, if it's not going to be nationally broadcast, an affordable easily accessible or free easily accessible stream should be set up. The Federations should have a process for communicating to every women's hockey organization in their federation that the game is taking place and here is the stream, and then let the team managers take it from there to communicate to the girls.

It's not that the women aren't worth the $30 to spend on them. I regret that calling for a more affordable viewing option can come across that way. For me, I think the women are priceless, and they need to be seen by more people. Also, we so often pay a premium to be a women's hockey fan (shipping prices on rare merchandise as an example), that we must recognize there is sometimes a breaking point, and people just can't keep going into their pocket. Further - consider how many women's hockey fans are also men's hockey fans and subscribe for TSN, NHL Network etc. It feels like you are paying twice for something that should be included.

Whew, got that off my chest! Now back to hockey.

Thursday, November 7, 2019

In Place of Four Nations: Canada vs the USA

Hello out there! We're on the air, it's hockey night tonight....

With a Stompin' Tom earworm, and thoughts on Budweiser's call to action for other brands and fans to join them and support women's hockey, let's do these traditionally looooooong 7 takes.

1- I am incredibly lucky in that tonight my family and I get to travel to Pittsburgh to watch Canada vs the United States, the second time in a year we've gotten to do so. Last time we watched with 9,000 people in Detroit; this time it's an intimate venue - the 1,500 seat UPMC Lemieux Sports Complex, otherwise known as the Penguins practice facility.

I want to note though, one price that was exacted for my family's entertainment. USA and Canada and Finland should be in Sweden this weekend. The Four Nations Tournament was canceled after the Swedish team boycotted their federation due to what they perceived as (and certainly seemed to be) unfair work conditions. Thankfully, the dispute has since been resolved, but not before this tournament was canceled by their federation, who was supposed to host. One positive takeaway from the dispute (in addition to the resolved work complaints) was that during the dispute multiple Swedish NHL'ers voiced their support for the women. Mika Zibanejad of the Rangers made a financial commitment to the women, and Henrik Lundquist spoke at length about the issue, and other Swedish players also voiced support. I am hopeful that as women's hockey pushes to get to the next level, more NHL players will join in support.

Onward and upward. Let's talk rosters and players I'm excited to watch.

2- Here's where I am at with rosters: The talent pool for both US and Canada is now so deep that picking 23 person rosters with the definitive best players has got to be impossible. There is literally too much talent at a similar level, which is a reason we need a proper league for the women, post college. I read a quote today from American defender Megan Keller, where she mentioned "not practicing every week," now that she's post college. This is mind boggling, but I digress.

The point I'm getting at is when I look at a Canada or US roster I immediately just think of all the great athletes who are missing,  because roster spots are limited. At the national team level it is what it is, but what a shame there is not a proper league with the infrastructure for these players to shine. Watts, Giguere, the Shirley sisters, Gebhard are a short list of Canadian collegiate athletes who might have been considered (oh, the Potomak sisters....there are seriously so many). And I think of  Brittany Howard who got one Hockey Canada camp, tore it up, eventually made Team Canada and then got one shift for the duration of the series, in part because there's pressure on Pearn to win, and so who has time to develop talent for the long term? We so badly need a proper developmental league for these players post college. And it's more difficult for the casual fan to get engaged at the national team level when it's a core plus a revolving door of players who are a smidge below the core talent wise.

In terms of veterans, biggest one who's missing that I would have loved to watch live is Meghan Agosta.  Other big names missing that come to mind are Szabados and Rebecca Johnston, as well as Brianna Decker. These are players who I suspect are not medically ready or have other things going on as they are proven veterans.

Regardless, I am lucky to watch some amazing players tonight.

3- Some Canadians I'm pumped to watch:
Marie-Philip Poulin: I haven't really seen her since last year's rivalry series as she got injured late in the CW season and then she was done. At the Rivalry Series I know she played with Bettez on one side and if I recall correctly, Daoust was still out with a knee injury for that series. So those three could be a line again this weekend. Canada really needs to produce against the US at even strength, and if not....at some point I'd look at switching something up and putting Loren Gabel with Poulin. I recognize that again this is perhaps unfair. What amount of time has Bettez had to prove herself alongside Poulin at the National level? 3 games?
Loren Gabel: 2x NCAA Champion, and most recent Patty Kaz winner Loren Gabel has several qualities: great timing for arriving on the scene and burying rebounds, thinks and executes the game extremely quickly, is cut from the same Championship winning big moment cloth that Poulin is. Anyone who gets to play with Poulin is going to get set up a ton. Gabel has already proven she can score against the US. I think she and Poulin could potentially do some damage against the US together.
The defense: I will fully admit I don't watch the defense enough when I watch hockey. I could learn a ton if I would make a better effort of it. Watching live, I want to take advantage of it. Canada has opted to bring 7 defense, 3 of whom are still in college. Of the 3 college defenders (there are also 3 college forwards) Claire Thompson and Micah Zandee-Hart play at Ivies which means their schedule started later and they have fewer games under their belt than Ella Shelton, a defender on the roster from Clarkson. I think the defense should be interesting as usual. The veteran defense are Larocque, Rougeau, Ambrose, and Fast. No Lacquette, which is a bit of a shame. I felt like she ripped the puck pretty well and was an offensive threat.

4- Some Americans I'm pumped to watch:
Hilary Knight: When I think of Knight on the ice, I pretty much think of a shark just circling waiting for its moment to go in for the kill. She appears to play with incredible efficiency, trusting her teammates to do their jobs, and then executing with precision when the puck comes her way. Her line of Hannah Brandt, Dani Cameranesi and herself is one of the most fun lines I've ever watched. I always feel like the replays explicitly show Cameranesi is setting up Knight, but I want to keep an eye on Brandt, who like a lot of players, flies under the radar due to the undercoverage of the sport and the fact that the US team is so loaded with talent. I suspect if I paid a bit more attention I'd see that Brandt is creating turnovers, that allow Knight and Cameranesi to blast off into the offensive zone.
The Lamoureux twins: After playing forward and absolutely crushing it at the Olympics, Monique is now being asked to play defense again. Pretty versatile player to be world class at multiple positions. There are probably no Americans that I want to see succeed more than Jocelyne and Monique. The brand that they have created for themselves is very compelling for me. Their advocacy in their foundation to #CheerForTheOneBehind, and the work they do with Comcast to get internet into the hands of kids who don't have access but need it to succeed in today's world is quite inspiring. Not to mention they have overcome their share of hockey heartache like any player who is around for a while, and I thought their 2018 Olympics were pretty much legendary. There was a lot of pressure on players like Knight and Duggan in those Olympics, and certainly they delivered, but not without a deep roster including the Lams, behind them.
Cayla Barnes: At last year's World's I noticed what an incredible skater she is. I look forward to seeing more of it tomorrow. Her Boston College Eagles are currently undefeated on the season, and you know Barnes is a big part of it.
Katie Burt: Another (former) Eagle, Burt holds the record for most NCAA wins by any goaltender. Her National Women's Senior team debut didn't go as she would have hoped, in last year's Rivalry Series, as the US Team fell 4-3 at Scotiabank Arena, in Toronto. Burt had a strong year with the Boston Pride before joining #ForTheGame and will be hungry to get another game against Canada. I suspect Alex (Rigsby) Cavallini will get the start tomorrow, but as an NCAA fan, I'd be pretty pumped to watch someone with Burt's NCAA pedigree perform.
Annie Pankowski: I've never seen her play live, and in my opinion no one in hockey (except maybe Jordan Binnington) had a more impressive 2018-2019 hockey story. Pankowski's story includes ample hockey heartache, but watching her lead Wisconsin to an NCAA Championship (endless highlight reel moments but the shorthanded goal in the NCAA final was a moment I thought she couldn't beat...until the WWC) and then slide right into the WWC roster and dominate was a thing to behold. Just an amazing story last year. Anyway, here's her deke to put USA up 2-0 in the shootout to win gold, nbd:



5- What else? Last year going into the WWC, I wondered if Amanda Kessel's best days were behind her. Ha. Lesson learned. Just for fun, here's a mere excerpt of Kessel's resume:
*3x NCAA Champion
*Patty Kazmaier Winner
*Olympic Gold Medalist
*3x World Champion
*Did I mention good at shootouts? Here she is at the 2019 WWC, getting the shootout gold right before Pankowski's, vs her old college teammate Noora Raty:



6- Enough talk about the players. Let's talk fans. Do you think the rink will be full? The Penguins have done a good job online promoting the event. Unfortunately the Robert Morris Colonials are on the road tomorrow, when a lot of women's college hockey teams are off this weekend. I expect every local girl hockey player will be in attendance. But there hasn't been much buzz about this even beyond that. I suspect attendance will be pretty solid, but we'll see.

7- At any rate, I made signs, because apparently that's a thing I do. I hope they are not too much. As is always the case with your earnest blogger over here, they are from the heart. :)








Thursday, October 17, 2019

Saturday, September 28, 2019

On writing about hockey, this phase of life, and a favorite passage from The Game

"As Pops used to say, 'Life is for the living.'
Be mindful of the moments."
-Bob McKenzie, Hockey Confidential

Hockey's back. Technically, the first NCAA regular season game was played last week, and this week it began in earnest, though the Mercyhurst Lakers won't kick off their regular season until next weekend, when they visit a good Colgate team on the road. Last week, in their preseason game, the Lakers defeated University of Guelph 4-0. I get the sense that Guelph is a bit depleted by graduations, but I'll still take a win against the reigning USports Champion as a good sign.

My life has changed a lot since I started following women's hockey in 2017, just insofar as I had an infant and a toddler and other than work, I was pretty homebound, and constantly trying to get kids to fall asleep. In 2017 online fandom gave me a chance to read about and be inspired by the great things women in sport were doing. I was definitely struggling with the isolation that my life had at the time, and struggling to reconcile myself to some realities that had made themselves apparent. I really needed and benefited from what I found in the community of people who wrote about and talked about women's hockey. I didn't see enough CHA or college commentary, had things of my own to say, and wanted to indulge my creative side, so eventually I started writing too. 

I actually found it really hard to just up and start a blog about hockey. As a child when I got into hockey I was oblivious to social norms. As an adult I have an awareness that not a lot of people write about women's hockey or their personal experiences with it. And so I was and often am, self conscious. Yet I wish there was more of this genre of writing. The only thing I knew how to do then, was start, and hope that somehow in the tiniest way possible, it might get more people to write too, if not today....years from now. I think about the Justin Bournes, the Dustin Fox's, guys that just started talking their sport after their playing days were done. I really do believe women's hockey would be richer, if we had more of that. For now, we are in a wonderful place with the voices who contribute, but there is always room for more.

I am definitely not done writing, and even want to keep recording my podcasts. I'm following hockey, and you'll find me here, probably in The Athletic comments (sometimes against my better judgement), and on the USCHO message board. I'm dialing back the twitter though. It's a wonderful servant, but a terrible master, and I'm just going to try to be mindful of that. I share this, because I value the friendships I've made there, and it doesn't feel right to just stop engaging, without comment.

It's definitely tough for me, making the time to nurture this creative side of me (especially in an environment of online distraction which makes me inefficient), but I really do love it. That said, I recognize that as my kids are getting older and less dependent, I am not tethered to the house like I once was, and that it is equally worth it for me to get out in 'the real world' again, and enjoy what life has to offer out there. 

After years away from hockey, I got the bug to play sports again, and while it's not hockey, I was able to start up a mom's soccer group at the field just down the street, and I've been loving doing that the past little while. I have to say though, I feel old! Took me four weeks to get to a point where I didn't feel like I spent the whole week recovering. My body feels good now though, and don't tell my husband but I called our local rink yesterday and asked about pickup hockey... you know how it is, when the game gets inside you.

***

I wanted to leave you with one of my favorite passages from The Game, by Ken Dryden. It's long and the better thing is for you just to read the book, as I will leave parts out here, lest I be typing all day. But it's the part where he talks about hockey in the backyard, and how that compared to his game in the NHL where his brother happened to be in the opposing net, and their dad in the crowd. At first, Dryden couldn't figure out why it felt anticlimactic, like he'd experienced before. And then he figured it out.

I like this passage because it illustrates how are connection to the game can occur in any number of changing ways, over a lifetime. If you are paying attention, you'll also see that the existence of pros, whose names we know, matters, even for kids who might not end up in the pros. Further, right now for me, one of the most joyful connections I have to the game is with my children in our driveway, in our non traditional hockey market, no rink having hometown.

***

From pages 66-67 of The Game by Ken Dryden:

The backyard was not a training ground. In all the time I spent there, I don't remember ever thinking I would be an NHL goalie, or even hoping I could be one. In backyard games, I dreamed I was Sawchuk or Hall, Mahovlich or Howe; I never dreamed I would be like them. There seemed no connection between the backyard and Maple Leaf Gardens; there seemed no way to get to there from here. If we ever thought about that, it never concerned us; we just played. It was here in the backyard that we learned hockey. It was here we got close to it, we got inside it, and it got inside us. It was here that our inextricable bond with the game was made. Many years have now passed, the game has grown up and been complicated by things outside it, yet still the backyard remains untouched, unchanged, my unseverable link to that time, and that game.

(and then after the NHL game versus his brother, mystified at his reaction):

When the game was over, proud and relieved, we shook hands at center ice. A few hours later, I began to feel differently. What had surprised and disappointed me earlier, I found exciting and reassuring. It really had been no different. those backyard games, the times we stood at opposite ends of the yard, the times we dreamed we were Sawchuk and Hall, we were Sawchuk and Hall, there had  been a connection - we just never knew it.

***
When I was in college, I remember thinking that a goal scored at Hobey Baker felt no different than a goal scored in a tournament at Chetwynd. It's incredible, but I guess that's just the game.